|
Post by gemlettuce on Apr 8, 2015 20:45:43 GMT
I'm a shit builder and I'm rubbish at PvP, don't know why you're so excited Cause you're a beautiful person, and we can name our Quadrant Purrty People <3 stop flirting with me, Jack will see.
|
|
|
Post by 2448jman on Apr 9, 2015 0:28:10 GMT
Well you see. People wanted this. I think it'd be much more fun like that. But we can't. It'll just become two major quadrants whilst the other two just wither and become inactive. You saw what happened when we were doing that, we had our whole team ready within 10 minutes. The aim of this is for people to work together, whether they be new or not, and I think random teams is the best way to go for this. A lot of others agree with me on this (Chris takes all the credit though <3). It's completely random apart from me putting irl friends together to make it more fun for them. If people want new random teams then we can do that, but from what I've seen, these teams seem pretty fair once you take into account the activity. why not separate the really active people from the not so active people the randomize each of those then put one team of really active with a team of not so active to make one quadrant.
|
|
|
Post by ladynarwhal on Apr 9, 2015 0:57:42 GMT
Well you see. People wanted this. I think it'd be much more fun like that. But we can't. It'll just become two major quadrants whilst the other two just wither and become inactive. You saw what happened when we were doing that, we had our whole team ready within 10 minutes. The aim of this is for people to work together, whether they be new or not, and I think random teams is the best way to go for this. A lot of others agree with me on this (Chris takes all the credit though <3). It's completely random apart from me putting irl friends together to make it more fun for them. If people want new random teams then we can do that, but from what I've seen, these teams seem pretty fair once you take into account the activity. why not separate the really active people from the not so active people the randomize each of those then put one team of really active with a team of not so active to make one quadrant. Because the active-heavy quadrants would be incredibly advanced from the inactive quadrants, simply because active people play more. It's better to have a mixture of active an inactive in each quadrant. Unless I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. I feel the current set up is balanced enough, despite my Quadrant (IV) having the least numbers of active players in it, however we do have both you (jman) and Chris, and you're both very strong players in your own ways (you're super freaking active, jman, and Chris is all battle-wizardry). However moving someone over from the largest team of actives, Quadrant II, to somewhere else without a large team of actives (such as my Quad) would be appreciated. Quad II has 10 actives, and we've got 6, which might still be considered just a tad unfair even with our stronger members.
|
|
|
Post by HighSeasSailor on Apr 9, 2015 3:00:55 GMT
Why are some names black?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2015 3:22:04 GMT
Why are some names black? Dong size. Black names indicated a dong longer than 3 inches.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 9, 2015 8:09:05 GMT
They're the big-dicked inactive people.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 9, 2015 8:14:16 GMT
why not separate the really active people from the not so active people the randomize each of those then put one team of really active with a team of not so active to make one quadrant. However moving someone over from the largest team of actives, Quadrant II, to somewhere else without a large team of actives (such as my Quad) would be appreciated. Quad II has 10 actives, and we've got 6, which might still be considered just a tad unfair even with our stronger members. That's true actually. The numbers were balanced (very lucky randomisation with player types) but then with irl friends together it got varied. I'll add DSNorth to your quadrant, he doesn't seem to mind which one he's in. TEAM DISCOVERY SIMPSONS
|
|
DSNorth
Subscribed to Lady
Posts: 279
|
Post by DSNorth on Apr 9, 2015 8:41:30 GMT
Why are some names black?
|
|
|
Post by Dray on Apr 9, 2015 10:13:02 GMT
Uhh I wouldn't say quadrant 4 is the smaest. Bougat Sandi and future aren't active at all at the moment in quadrant 1
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 9, 2015 10:23:39 GMT
I talk to Sandy most days, he's just fed up with this map. Future is the same but he said he'd be active as well. Bougat is back into Minecraft and told me he'd play.
|
|
|
Post by Ard on Apr 9, 2015 13:11:09 GMT
YEAH DRAY TAKE THAT
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 9, 2015 13:23:43 GMT
YEAH DRAY GAWD L2PEOPLE
|
|
|
Post by Dray on Apr 9, 2015 13:33:35 GMT
I talk to Sandy most days, he's just fed up with this map. Future is the same but he said he'd be active as well. Bougat is back into Minecraft and told me he'd play. Ok so the teams are based on who will be active on the new map then? In that case is it not also fair to assume that most of Quadrant 4 will be active even though they weren't on the last map, same as Quadrant 1?
|
|
|
Post by HighSeasSailor on Apr 9, 2015 14:12:51 GMT
Why are some names black? Thank god! I was worried it might be used to denote a privilege of some sort, which would be distasteful.
|
|
|
Post by Sandionus on Apr 9, 2015 14:15:28 GMT
Uhh I wouldn't say quadrant 4 is the smaest. Bougat Sandi and future aren't active at all at the moment in quadrant 1 You wot Dray I'm here I'm just bored with this map.. There is not much to do on it for me
|
|